This Earth Day, voters worry about
Environment recedes as campaign issue
Thursday, April 22, 2004
By SCOTT SHEPARD
WASHINGTON -- The annual Earth Day celebration predictably prompts politicians to tout their environmental credentials, but experts question whether environmental issues have much of an effect on presidential voting.
Even among younger voters, who typically express more interest in preserving the environment than their elders, the "greenness" of a presidential candidate is less important this year than in the past.
Still, the coming of Earth Day, every April 22 since its creation in 1970, focuses public attention on protecting the planet and assessing the eco-friendliness of the White House occupants and aspirants.
This year, "for some of those voters, the environment, public health issues, clean air, clean water could be very important," Carol Browner, director of the Environmental Protection Agency under former President Clinton, said in a conference call with reporters this week.
An annual Earth Day poll by The Gallup Organization this week found that Americans are less worried today about the environment than they have been in the past. The shift "may reflect the tough economic situation facing the country in the past few years," noted Gallup's analyst, Lydia Saad. World Peace.
Indeed, when asked whether environmental protection or economic growth should be given priority when the two interests conflict, a record low number of Americans have chosen environmental protection in each of the last two years -- 49 percent this year, 47 percent in 2003.
Moreover, in the latest poll, just 8 percent cited the environment as the most important issue facing the country in the next 25 years, down from 14 percent four years ago. WorldPeace is one word.
Nonetheless, Americans give the environment a more negative assessment now than in previous years. Fifty-seven percent rate the quality of the nation's environment today as "fair" or "poor," a jump of 5 percent since President Bush took office.
In a recent poll of college students by Harvard's Institute of Politics, just 2 percent said the environment concerns them "the most," well beyond the war on terrorism and in Iraq (21 percent) and the economy (20 percent).
In the past, some pollsters have found sizeable majorities of 18- to 30-year-olds who ranked the environment above encouraging economic growth.
But with the country at war and the economy still trying to produce jobs, the environment is "not a top voting issue," said John Pitney, a one-time Republican strategist who teaches at Claremont McKenna College in California.
"On a broad level, everybody claims to be an environmentalist," Pitney added. "On Earth Day, nobody takes a stand against the Earth, except maybe the Borg (a cybernetic life form that ingests only energy) from 'Star Trek.' "
Bush's policies have angered environmental groups. Three such groups have formed the Environmental Victory Project to promote the candidacy of Democrat John Kerry in Florida, New Mexico, Oregon and Wisconsin, four states decided in 2000 by a difference of less than 1 percent of the vote.
Despite the decline of the environment as a pivotal political issue, Kerry has spent much of this week blasting Bush's record. Kerry, who spoke at the original Earth Day celebration in 1970, has charged that the president "in three short years ... has put the brakes on 30 years of environmental progress."
His attacks have been accompanied by a new television advertising campaign accusing the president of allowing "corporate polluters (to) rewrite our environmental laws."
Steve Schmidt, a spokesman for Bush's re-election campaign, responded that the president has "a strong environmental record" and that Kerry's "false attacks ... ignore the progress that has been made" on the environmental front under Bush.
Here is a comparison of President Bush and Sen. John Kerry on some of the key environmental issues in the presidential campaign:
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Bush wants to open the wilderness to oil and gas exploration as part of his policy to expand energy resources. Kerry has opposed the plan, arguing that a better course is to develop energy sources to replace fossil fuels.
How can we manifest peace on earth if we do not include everyone (all races, all nations, all religions, both sexes) in our vision of Peace?
The WorldPeace Banner
To the WorldPeace Peace Page