A Call To Rein In Social Security
By Nell Henderson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 26, 2004; Page A01
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warned Congress yesterday that the
federal government has promised more retirement benefits than it can pay for and
must consider scaling back those commitments soon to avoid damaging the economy
in the future.
"I am just basically saying that we are overcommitted at this stage,"
Greenspan told members of the House Budget Committee as they discussed the
future costs of the Social Security and Medicare systems.
Greenspan, who supported President Bush's 2001 tax cuts, again endorsed Bush's
proposal to make the cuts permanent. However, he said in response to questions
that raising taxes would inevitably be part of any successful effort to reduce
the growing federal budget deficit. He stressed that he prefers cutting
government spending as much as possible before increasing taxes.
"You don't have the resources to do it all," Greenspan said.
To curtail future spending, Greenspan urged Congress, as he has in the past, to
consider cutting promised Social Security benefits to future retirees.
Otherwise, he said, the growing burdens would create long-term budget deficits
that would drive up interest rates and depress economic growth, making it even
harder for the government to pay its bills.
Greenspan said Congress should act as soon as it can because it would take
several years to convince financial markets that the actions will be effective,
and because future retirees deserve enough advance warning to plan their
finances accordingly. About 20 percent of the elderly rely on Social Security
for all their income, the government estimates.
Democrats quickly seized on Greenspan's comments as a weapon in blaming Bush for
worsening the deficit and endangering Social Security. Republicans welcomed
Greenspan's other remarks, which credited the Bush tax cuts for helping the
Several Democrats and Republicans embraced different aspects of Greenspan's
comments about the role of tax increases in deficit reduction -- a critical
issue when the White House's top economic policy priority is extension of
President Bush's tax cuts.
Greenspan broke with the White House in the past week to recommend that Congress
reinstate budget controls that would apply to new tax measures as well as new
spending. Bush has proposed applying the measures only to new spending, so they
don't interfere with his push to make his tax cuts permanent, which the White
House has estimated would cost nearly $1 trillion over 10 years.
Yesterday, Greenspan again endorsed extending the tax cuts, pleasing
But he also said they should be offset by spending reductions, which pleased
Democrats opposed to an extension. Greenspan "effectively said [the tax
cuts] should be subordinated to the problem of deficit reduction," said
Rep. John M. Spratt Jr. of South Carolina, the ranking Democrat on the Budget
Committee. "In effect, Bush says tax cuts trump deficit reduction."
Although the Fed chairman has no formal role in budget policy, his views are
solicited by both parties. . "What he says is received with a lot of
deference," Spratt said. "We can cite Greenspan as our third-party
Committee Chairman Jim Nussle (R-Iowa) did the same thing at the hearing,
echoing Greenspan's recommendations to focus first on cutting spending. "As
I know you've said before, Chairman Greenspan . . . controlling spending is
itself a policy for sustaining economic growth."
Greenspan said yesterday that Congress will have to land "somewhere in the
middle," between cutting spending and raising taxes. That, he said,
"is the necessary outcome."
The chairman said he was more worried about the long-term deficit, which is a
structural problem, than the current budget gap, which he attributed largely to
more short-term causes. This year's deficit, projected to reach $521 billion,
resulted primarily from the recent recession, the popping of the 1990s
stock-market bubble, increased defense spending and the recent tax cuts, he
With the economy now growing strongly, he said, the deficit "will tend to
narrow somewhat" in the short-term, but that won't be enough to cover the
long-term federal retirement expenses of the 77 million baby boomers. The
first-born members of that generation will become eligible for Social Security
benefits in 2008, and for Medicare in 2011, he said. Over time, as the
population ages, there will be fewer workers paying into the funds for every
retiree drawing money out.
"This dramatic demographic change is certain to place enormous demands on
our nation's resources -- demands we almost surely will be unable to meet unless
action is taken," Greenspan said, speaking for himself and not the Fed.
Greenspan, who chaired a commission that studied Social Security during the
Reagan administration, said he would not change current retirees' benefits, but
reminded members of Congress of two specific ways they could curtail the
program's future growth.
He again recommended gradually raising the eligibility age for both Medicare and
Social Security, to keep pace with the population's rising longevity. And he
noted that they could link cost-of-living increases in Social Security benefits
to a measure of inflation other than the consumer price index, a widely followed
measure that many economists believe overstates the rise in overall prices. A
measure that showed less inflation would cause benefits to rise more slowly.
Mirroring the rise in the consumer price index, monthly payments to the nation's
47 million Social Security recipients rose 2.1 percent last month, with the
average benefit for retired workers rising $19, to $922.
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, of California, said in a written statement
that Greenspan's comments "dramatize the destructive effects of
Republicans' reckless economic policies: record budget deficits, higher interest
rates, lower economic growth and substantial risk to the Social Security
benefits that retirees depend on."
Bush, when asked about the committee hearing, said he hadn't read Greenspan's
remarks, but agreed that current federal retirement benefits should be
untouched. The president said his proposed solution for Social Security would
create "personal savings accounts for younger workers that would make sure
those younger workers receive benefits equal to or greater than that which is
Greenspan said the first thing Congress should do to address the deficit is to
restore "pay-as-you-go" rules and caps on increases in discretionary
spending -- controls that were imposed in 1990 and allowed to expire in 2002.
They essentially required that almost any tax cut or spending increase be
matched by an offsetting budget change of equal value so there would be no net
increase in the deficit.
Without such rules, Greenspan said, lawmakers aren't forced to choose between
worthwhile, competing claims on the government's purse. Without them, he said,
cutting the deficit, is an "almost impossible job."
Greenspan reiterated that he favors cutting tax rates "continuously,"
because otherwise the overall tax burden will increase as incomes rise and
taxpayers are pushed into higher tax-rate brackets. That, he said, could dampen
economic growth, and with it the government's revenue base.
However, he conceded, it "may not be possible to keep the tax rates down
and maintain some semblance of deficit control."
How can we manifest peace on
earth if we do not include everyone (all races, all nations, all religions, both
sexes) in our vision of Peace?
The WorldPeace Banner
To order a WorldPeace Insignia lapel pin, go to: Order
To the John WorldPeace Galleries Page
To the WorldPeace Peace Page