"Good Luck my son"
Accused priests turn to the courts, not the Pope, for
It is interesting that individual church employees are becoming more and more
integrated into the American legal justice system because it provides a better
chance for earthly justice.
The Pope has no firm on retainer to fiercely fight for the rights of these
priests who have been accused of sexually abusing children. In fact, the
church would lose a lot of credibility if it put up a multi-million dollar
defense of these priests. The Pope has to concern himself with preserving
the church bureaucracy and therefore the Pope must do that which will cost the
church the fewest members.
If the Pope fights for priests who are eventually found guilty of sexual
abuse, then the church will be criticized for being in denial. If the Pope
does not fight for his employee priests, then there will be a sense of
hopelessness and abandonment by the priesthood.
In every corporation in America, gigantic legal fees are spent to prove that
corporations do no harm. The chain of command must be protected and
preserved because corporate America understands that it is constantly at
war. It understands, that like an army, the chain of command must be
maintained or there will be disintegration.
But what do you do with a Pope who refuses to allow women into the priesthood
and by inaction defends sexually abusive priests? You begin to ignore
him. That is what you do.
All over America the church is in decay. Membership is dropping.
Few people rely on the church bureaucracy for any real help anymore. Just
like the accused priests, the people know that real ustice lies in the secular
God is still alive and well. And spirituality remains a part of human
beings. But the church bureaucracy with all its rites and rituals is
disintegrating. The reigning bureaucracies on earth are the democratic
societies and these accused priests understand this. Their job security
lies in the American courts and not in the golden arches of the Vatican.
September 15, 2002
Church Abuse Strategy Hits Obstacles
Plan to Oust Sexually Abusive Priests May Be Unraveling as Resistance Mounts
By RACHEL ZOLL
.c The Associated Press
NEW YORK (Sept. 14) - The reforms were meant to restore trust and end a crisis. But three months after America's Roman Catholic bishops promised to aggressively discipline priests who molest children, resistance to their policy is intensifying and the plan could be coming undone.
Parishioners are rallying behind accused priests. Clergy are suing alleged victims and complaining to the Vatican. Experts in church law are questioning whether the plan violates priests' rights.
Leaders of religious orders have accused the bishops of ignoring Catholic teaching on redemption and are allowing some abusers to continue their church work away from children.
``It is unraveling,'' said the Rev. Richard McBrien, a liberal theologian from the University of Notre Dame.
``I don't think anybody knows where we're headed,'' said Philip Lawler, a conservative and editor of Catholic World Report magazine.
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops insists its members are on the right track. Officials point to dioceses nationwide that have expanded their lay review boards, hired people to help victims and suspended accused priests.
At least 300 of the nation's 46,000 clergy have either resigned or been taken off duty over abuse claims since the molestation crisis erupted in January with the case of one predator in the Archdiocese of Boston. Under the bishops' policy, guilty priests are to be removed from all church work - from saying Mass to teaching school to balancing the parish's books - and in some cases from the priesthood altogether.
``If anything, the majority of the signs have been of a readiness to put the charter into effect,'' said Monsignor Francis Maniscalco, a spokesman for the bishops' conference.
However some bishops have delayed implementing parts of the plan, such as ousting abusers from the priesthood, until the Vatican weighs in, and several analysts predict the Holy See will reject it. Rome's approval is needed to make the policy binding on U.S. dioceses, otherwise the policy approved June 14 in Dallas is simply a gentlemen's agreement.
The bishops have said that even if the plan is voluntary, no church leader would dare ignore it in this climate of public anger over mishandled abuse cases. The prelates formed a lay committee, the National Review Board, to evaluate whether dioceses were in compliance.
Yet the man the bishops recruited to head the panel, Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating, is already under attack from within the church, even before he holds his second meeting with the commission Monday.
The Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Council of Priests said Keating was ``more concerned with manipulating the public's emotions than seeking the truth.'' Keating's own prelate, Archbishop Eusebius Beltran, accused the governor of encouraging Catholics ``to commit a mortal sin'' when he said parishioners should switch dioceses if their bishop fails to properly address abuse.
More criticism of Keating came from the archdiocesan newspaper of Boston Cardinal Bernard F. Law, who sparked the crisis by acknowledging he allowed abusive former priest John Geoghan to continue in parish work.
Rank-and-file Catholics are directing their anger at bishops.
At St. Rose of Lima Church in Cleveland, where the Rev. James Viall was accused of abuse and suspended, parishioners spoke up for the priest and jeered at diocesan administrators who urged compassion for victims. A flier inserted into the church's Sunday bulletin asked parishioners to fight for Viall's return.
Members of St. John Parish in Worcester, Mass., have rallied around the Rev. Joseph A. Coonan, who was suspended over abuse claims from before he was ordained.
Priests upset over the policy have been openly defiant. They are enraged that accused clergy are being publicly removed from pulpits without a formal process for defending themselves, and church lawyers are voicing similar complaints.
The Rev. Kevin McKenna, president of the Canon Law Society of America, wrote in an analysis in the Jesuit magazine America that the church law in effect at the time of an alleged molestation should be applied when cases are investigated. The majority of claims made this year are from years and even decades ago.
McKenna also joined those questioning whether the policy sufficiently emphasizes due process protections for priests. He worried that the reforms themselves could ``violate basic human rights.''
Some Worcester Diocese priests have asked fellow clergy to sign a letter to the Vatican opposing the policy.
There is no indication when the Vatican will issue its decision on the Dallas plan. The bishops are expected to address some of the criticisms at their next national meeting in November, but the policy itself does not come under full review for two years.
``The key thing here is how to work out due process procedures that protect the rights of the accused while at the same time protecting the community from abusers,'' said the Rev. Thomas Reese, editor of America. ``I don't think it's going to be easily resolved.''
09/14/02 16:51 EDT
How can we manifest peace on
earth if we do not include everyone (all races, all nations, all religions, both
sexes) in our vision of Peace?
The WorldPeace Banner
The WorldPeace Sign
To the John WorldPeace Galleries Page
To the WorldPeace Peace Page